Jayme Maltbie
America's Search for a Cultural Center

 

The average American child can not even comprehend what institutions provide cultural enhancement. Is that too bold a statement? I don't think so. Primarily because American culture probably doesn't exist in any real form. The closest we get to art is in our cinema. Art as a practiced form is lost. Literacy rates are abominable, museums are underfunded in response to the lack of public interest in viewing their wares, and art classes are practically non-existent as more and more schools have cut those programs in response to budgetary concerns. Art is a learned appreciation. And we are not teaching it. But good cinema can incite conversation, can entertain, and can act as an artistic base for our children. And even good cinema is disappearing . . . sacrificed to the gods of the commercial movie.

It is this commercial movie industry that the city leaders of San Jose seem most intent on protecting. Our city has experienced profound growing pains as we've made the transition from agricultural area, to bedroom community and finally to the bustling metropolis known as Silicon Valley. How cherry orchards birthed Pentium chips is a story for another day . . . but in the process they have brought disparate social classes together in a way that leaves everyone struggling for some sort of cultural base. In the 90's we've seen downtown San Jose develop into a thriving urban area. But in the twenty years of redevelopment San Jose has been forced to deal with urban decay that has jeopardized the city and many of its core institutions. Urban anthropologist, Bob Beauregard, paints a bleak picture of the American city in his book, Voices of Decline, saying America's cities, large and small, are standing on the verge of catastrophe, "Deteriorated and outmoded buildings were prevalent . . . The first concern became the issue of blight, the second of slums. The bifurcation was reinforced by a corresponding appropriation of different parts of the city." San Jose's redevelopment agency has faced the same prospects in their attempts to create a beautiful downtown area that would attract the business community. But even as they put up buildings for high tech companies on newly appropriated redevelopment turf the dickering continues over what to do with the lingering abandoned landmarks. Culture and business are often at the core of any downtown. Rich cultural venues, like theater, cinema, and art galleries attract those people who would be patrons. But the proximity of business anchors them to the area. And that is one of the functions the Camera Cinema's initially provided to a struggling downtown San Jose.

In the early years of redevelopment, the downtown had no soul. Any draw it did have amidst the closed shops and construction came from the enterprising theaters that brought variety to the cultural film life of the growing community. Even today with all the success Frank Taylor's agency can claim many of the area's small businesses, the shops and boutiques that bring charm and character, are boarded up, awaiting new occupants San Jose is struggling to find. Facing these problems city leaders decided a commercial theater could attract people to the downtown area, where they might enjoy the city's nightlife and return to visit its shops. The people knew better, they knew they already had a film institution, one in need of their protection.

The profile of the average art film patron is someone who is willing to spend some money. They will attend dinner or get drinks before or after. They are generally well-educated, middle class people. These people are looking to spend an evening out and they want to be stimulated not merely entertained. These groups also stand a better chance of owning businesses or working in industries that could be moved to the downtown area. But only if downtown San Jose has something to offer. In the early 80's there were few restaurants or bars that anyone would want to frequent. What could possibly move these groups to encourage their customers to come to the downtown area to utilize their services? The Camera Cinema's offered at least some of this ambiance. They were artistic, they were connected to downtown's major university, and they had a following. But the city of San Jose in its zeal to increase the number of businesses in the downtown area was fast on its way to pushing one business out in favor of another.

They were on the verge of approving a 16-screen AMC multiplex that would be forced to draw on art films to fill all of the screens in the massive theater. Effectively competing with the Camera's on their own turf. A 16-screen plex was guaranteed to drive the Camera's out of business, effectively, "replacing one viable business with another" (Camera Cinemas Patron Survey, 1993). This couldn't possibly be the redevelopment agency's goal, they wanted to increase the flow of cash into the area . . . not level it off. In the survey, conducted by the theaters to determine their importance to the people of the community, they discovered that more people - 275,000 - attended their screenings every year than visited the San Jose Repertory Theater. The Camera's owners were not unrealistic in their position. They recognized that commercial theater would bring a larger group downtown, people that would be more inclined to visit the city's nightclubs and bars. But they knew, they as a cultural institution also needed protection. Now, years later, they remain while even the commercial film venue that was finally agreed upon for the downtown area departs the scene.

 

Art films give the public something more than happy endings with loud explosions. And while they don't appeal to everyone for that very reason, they are different, something that can't be found in every neighborhood. And occasionally they are revolutionary. The Camera's offered showings of "Like Water For Chocolate", "Life Is Beautiful", "The Piano", and of course, "The Blair Witch Project" - all films that gained popularity in the mainstream. But none that could've been predicted based on their content. And it is these movies that spur Hollywood film machines to do better, and more interesting work, because these films make it clear that indeed, there is an audience ready to pay to see them. Isn't that what art is needed for? To make people 'think different'? Where better to do that than in Silicon Valley, home to different thinking?

Why is art film in San Jose necessary? The answer to that question is complex, but put simply, people don't understand how they're supposed to feel about art. Arts and theater programs can help keep marginal students stay in school, possibly lowering California's embarrassing drop out rates. Students are pressured to achieve success on tests designed to meet only the minimal skills. Those students who fail can be saved by a love of theater, art, or photography (Kozol, 101). We rarely teach art appreciation in the classroom, so understanding great works of art is made intimidating. Instead even those brave souls who venture into places like downtown's museum of modern art stand about uncomfortably trying to understand what it is they should see in the colors laid out on canvas before them. Theater is perceived as expensive, and sometimes antiquated. But even as parts of California successfully pulled themselves out of the early 90's recession, important cultural venues like the San Diego Symphony and the Sacramento Symphony Orchestra were filing for bankruptcy due to a lack of public interest (Schrag, 122-123).

The inundation of movie magic has robbed most people of the ability to sit through several hours of singing, dancing, or dialogue without an explosion, or gun battle. We like our resolutions to arrive quickly and neatly. But it is the lifestyle of today's average San Josean that most calls for the art film experience. Silicon Valley executives fit the profile of the art filmgoer. But they are even needier. This group needs human contact and conversation. Because so many jobs today are isolating, removing the most basic human need. Art films are most often about relationships and contact. And they provide insights. Even when an audience member has not particularly enjoyed the film, the opportunity to discuss with friends and family what it is that bothered you exists. What is there to talk about after 'Die Hard 16', but how large the final explosion/ gun play scene was? Or how many times Bruce Willis cursed throughout the movie?

And art films are not prolific in nature. The large Hollywood movie-makers will put out an enormous amount of product every year. They effectively saturate the market, ensuring the average movie-goer has something new to see nearly every weekend at the box office. Art films must be somewhat more discriminating because by nature their patrons are more discriminating. But art film in San Jose helps to keep patronage local. Like so many things, the downtown area has had difficulty building a following because the cultural venues, shopping and businesses traditionally offered in a large urban area simply don't exist there. People view areas like, San Francisco and Palo Alto as the places that will meet their needs. Hundreds of thousands more people every year frequent the downtown area, take in dinner and a movie, or have a drink or coffee, because The Camera complexes exist.

Art films can also reach people marginalized by the workaday ethic of the Silicon Valley. Asians, newly settling into the area, want to feel connected to a home they left behind. The camera cinema's have also played a role in their lives. Asian American film makers have begun to cross over, where once they were 'lumped' with the fight movies coming out of Asia (Feng, 1999). Asian American directors like Wayne Wang, "The Joy Luck Club" and Ang Lee, "Eat Drink Man Woman" and "The Wedding Banquet", are becoming mainstays of the art film circle and are slowly making their way into nation-wide release. Asian actors and filmmakers are also finding ways to repackage 'Hong Kong movies' for an American film market. And nowhere are those movies more in demand than in the Silicon Valley. But they still struggle to gain theatrical release, "the different paths they have taken to distribution reveals much about the way independent films are released in the U.S." (Feng, 1999) - a problem camera's owners have been sensitive to as they have chosen movies and created Asian film nights, allowing Asian culture to be reflected on screen, validating the experiences of the identity struggle many Asian Americans face. Movie houses in the business of promoting independent films have an opportunity to unite filmmakers struggling to find a community with a coalition of Asian peoples struggling to find an identity in America. "Sunsets", an Asian American film that is still awaiting theatrical release, pays homage to the American art house cinema with gritty black and white cinematography and long takes (Feng, 1999). Clearly, we can see the Asian film community acknowledging it's debt to the artistic venues that have supported it.

But it's the Camera Cinemas who have also been forced to appeal to the community for their support in the face of the city's negotiations, which threatened to put an end to the popular venue. In a May 16, 1993, letter to the editor the general partners wrote, "Every time the project is resurrected, the number of screens has been increased. When it was 10 screens (just two years ago), AMC and Simon acknowledged that the new theaters would hurt Camera Cinemas. Today they are proposing 16." Ultimately, the small cultural theater won that battle, but will they win the war? Is it the egos of the redevelopment machine that make it impossible for them to support a venue which has done so much good for their area without redevelopment backing? Or perhaps the theater's success is a slap in the face as multiplex projects try and fail in the downtown area? But the battle will continue, in order that this important institution be kept alive.

We have collectively stood by as our city's soul has crumbled away, as the kind of alternative education that can help keep marginal students in school to graduation is stripped away from poorly funded inner-city schools. Without an artistic education the next generation will continue to ignore museums, theater, opera, and symphony, and these cultural institutions will continue to fail. But the crisis of identity goes further. America celebrates its heritage as a 'melting pot' and in doing so blends communities with such wide diversity as Asian Americans together, virtually eliminating the group's many far-reaching differences. The support of art venues can continue the tradition of culture in the downtown areas, and provide a voice for groups struggling for community in the United States. At home and across the country America has an obligation to celebrate her art-houses, by keeping the camera's rolling.

Works Cited

1. Beauregard, B. (1993). Voices of Decline. Blackwell Publishers: Cambridge, Massachusetts.

2. Feng, P. (Fall 1999). "The State of Asian American Cinema: In Search of Community". Cineaste, 24.

3. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage Inequalities. Crown Publishers: New York, NY.

4. Camera Cinemas (May 1993). "Questions And Answers Concerning The Proposed Downtown Theatre Complex And Its Impact On Camera Cinemas".

5. Schrag, P. (1998). Paradise Lost: California's Experience and America's Future. The New Press: New York, NY.