Jennifer Dyer
Film Festival Start ups

 

Silicon Valley fairly bursts with life and energy. Everywhere you look new companies, ideas and innovations are on the move and on the rise. Welcome to the land of start ups; small companies with a dream who survive and thrive by skill, luck and sheer tenacity. While the term usually describes high tech concepts, start-ups abound in the Valley - from the small catering company on the comer to the neighborhood printing shop down the street to the local film festival. Yes, that's right - film festival.

The Local Scene

"Film festival" usually conjures images of stretch limos, glittering starts and rabid paparazzi. Think Cannes or Sundance and you think big budgets, big egos and big-time Hollywood take over. Even smaller, more local festivals have the same overtones. Take the San Francisco International Film Festival. Champion of such "outsider" interests as gay rights, and American Indians long before those concepts became acceptable, SFIFF has mellowed with maturity. Called the "gray lady of local fests" by Dennis Harvey in Variety (June 30, 1997), the SFIFF continues to support international diversity, but with more of a prestigious, elitist atmosphere. The air, apparently, has become more rarified in San Francisco. The second largest film festival in the Bay Area, the Mill Valley Festival has a much more relaxed atmosphere. But, even within this atmosphere, some of the need for mainstream acceptance and money tends to bleed through.

Start-ups seem to have two destinies - wonderful success or complete failure, with little middle ground. Other film festivals have ventured into the Silicon Valley before. Most of them had wonderful prospects - at the beginning. The Santa Cruz Festival, the San Jose Film Festival and the Monterey Film Festival, all showed great promise, and none made it to a third year. The Santa Cruz Festival ran from 1982 to 1985, and died of erratic handling. Part of the Santa Cruz charm is its dedication causes, its fierce independence and the feel that comes together with one word - Burkenstocks. Unfortunately, the wild, eccentric and fairly unorganized tendency that adds charm to the city killed the film festival. With wildly erratic programming that could confuse even dedicated fans and the death of festival found Les Goldman in 1986, the Santa Cruz Festival passed into the night.

In 1984 San Jose made its stab at a festival. The Cinema of the Fantastic focused on science-fiction and fantasy in the beginning. And with a star heavy line up in the first year, it appeared to hold its own. However, the vision that drives a festival quickly disappeared. Director John Webber stepped down in the third year, and the festival moved to a more "transitional festival." In other words, boards members "were frankly embarrassed by lowbudget science fiction" (SJ Mercury, 10/7/90) and tried to move the festival towards a more high-brow vision. The result, a confused mess of movies that lost what few supporters remained.

Then came the Monterey Film Festival in 1987. According to Greg Lovell (San Jose Mercury News, 1990), Monterey "arrived on the scene fully grown. While other festivals literally take decades to establish an identity and track record, Monterey ... has cut corners by making shrewd use of its Hollywood contacts and what has to be the most spectacular festival setting in the U.S.' That too-good-to-be-true description should have been a tip-off." Monterey had the facade, the connections and the glamour of a film festival. Unfortunately, it didn't have the substance. In 1989 the organizers quit, claiming $30,000 in back salary and the festival died, leaving angry merchants and disillusioned fans.

 

Enter Cinequest

Into this dismal (and fairly scary) graveyard of fests ventured two independent filmmakers. Frustrated by the lack of local venues for their own wares, in 1989 Halfdan Hussie and Kathleen Powell came together to dream of a festival that would honor those who walked on the other side of mainstream, of a festival that would encourage undiscovered artists, of a festival that would recognize talent over money. Thus, Cinequest was born.

The two teamed with San Jose promoter Michelle Vendelin to create the Cinequest program. Together, they approached and intrigued the owners of the Camera Cinemas. Long recognized as the heart of the San Jose's art film world, the owners Jim Zuur and Jack NyBlom listened intently. Impressed with the drive and focus of the organizers, the Cameras agreed to back the fledgling festival by donating several key nights and helping to establish several key industry contacts. "We were impressed from the outset," said NyBlom to the Mercury in 1990. "They were so damn well organized." At the time the event had a three to five year plan.

Cinequest I came onto the scene in 1990, moving to a different beat. Subtitled "Before their Time: Maverick Film Makers," the festival focused on independent American film makers. The event showed 13 features, one documentary and assorted short films. It also intrigued many industry names. Jan Jost, a San Francisco film maker, received the first (mini)tribute. "Other festivals embrace Hollywood and international production," said Jost to the Mercury in 1990. "So you get lost. At the San Francisco Festival, the tendency is: if something's subtitled, it's an art film. I appreciate the fact that San Jose wants to do something different." The festival drew 2,300 people into the downtown area and earned approximately $5,000. An attendance of 60 percent and favorable reviews completed the goals of a very happy committee.

Cinequest brings more to the table than just another film festival, however. Hussie and crew also created the Cinequest Foundation. From the beginning, Cinequest has wanted to support the talents creating the wonderful films shown at festivals. Hussie and his partners determined to put 50 percent of the festival profits aside to help "select film artists." The Foundation would be a resource for young, new artists. The focus would be showing them the ropes in the festivals world - mainly how to get work. In Cinequest 1, both Cinecom and Miramax had representatives present to advise participants. This aspect greatly impressed director Henry Jaglom. "'I'd never heard of that before (festival proceeds going to film makers),' he says from his L.A. office [to the Mercury News]. ' I love that. I don't know another festival that does that. That's sufficient reason (to become involved) right there.'" Jaglom, director of the most controversial and biggest drawing film "Eating", was the opening night guest for Cinequest 1.

Resounding Success

Now, jump to 1999. The festival with the three to five year plan finished its ninth event to record numbers. Thirty-two thousand film buffs flocked to the festival this year, pushing the box office to $102,000, a 25 percent increase over last year's figures. In fact, in the land that readily killed local festivals, Cinequest has grown steadily, increasing attendance approximately 20 percent each year. Gathering loyal fans and good industry name, Cinequest has become a Silicon Valley start-up success story. From the 14 films shown at Cinequest 1, the festival now boasts over 100 films by 182 film makers from over 28 countries. Submissions for the 1999 festival increased to over 800, which the staff attributes to the success of the 1998 festival. According to the Cinequest website (http://www.cinequest.org) "We've received an amazing number of high quality films from all over the world," said Programming Director Mike Rabehl. "Culling them down was an exciting challenge."

And through it all, the festival has striven to remain true to its maverick roots.

It was in the spirit of the maverick that Cinequest was founded by filmakers and Silicon Valley engineers. Through a personable world-class meeting ground of filmmaking, film fans, film distributors, and the technology that is reshaping the industry, Cinequest works to inspire and enable mavericks to realize their creative visions. (Mission statement on the Cinequest website)

"A maverick is an individual who breaks from convention and boundaries, picturing new possibilities and creating a personal or innovative statement," says Hussie on the festival's website. The festival holds this ideal to its heart. "The most important thing about Cinequest is that it showcases new films by independent film makers," said Australia's Aleksi Vellis to the Mercury in 1991. "I've been to St. Louis and Dallas with this film (Nirvana Street Murder), but I felt at home at Cinequest, which is more manageable. Big festivals tend to get anonymous."

Past honorees and attendees of the festival have included Jackie Chan, Gabriel Bryant, Jennifer Jason Leigh and Kevin Spacey just to name a few of the more well known names. "Our vision has always been very clear: We're a festival about mavericks," Hussie said to the Chronicle in 1998. "Ninety percent of the filmmakers here are first-time film makers or older film makers whose work isn't well known... It's a relaxed, personable environment. It's not about needing to know me to get behind closed doors to the big-name parties. That's why the big names come here."

But even with "names" attending, Cinequest strives to keep the intimate, educational atmosphere and avoid the Hollywood hype. For example, Cinequest V presented two seminars: Sex in the Cinema and Working Locally. The festival has also reached out the surrounding community by including such sections as the Latino Tribute, the After Hours segment and even an elementary school out-reach program.

Cinequest is expanding into the digital age as well, with recent documentaries and seminars regarding the advancements in technology and film. Cinequest IX featured two presentations on digital film making and a showing of completely digital short films. The new technology allows film makers to create more sophisticated images on lower budgets, and revolutionized post production in a way that can not be denied. However, "We don't want to just bow to technology and say how wonderful it is," Hussie cautions in the San Francisco Chronicle. "We want to explore the pros and cons of the technologies in terms of what they do better than traditional technologies, and what they do worse."

Resources

Guthmann, E. (January 28, 1999). "A film festival for mavericks Spacey, Schlesinger on bill in San Jose." The San Francisco Chronicle. E6.

Guthmann, E. (February 24, 1999) "Cinequest dives into digital age." The San Francisco Chronicle. E2

Harvey, D. (June 30, 1997). "A fest for every taste. (Bay area audiences support diverse production.) Variety. 44.

Lovell, G. (October 27, 1990). "S.J. film festival a screening success." The San Jose Mercury News. 3 C.

Lovell, G. (October 7, 1990). "Shot by shot: How the festival was put together." The San Jose Mercury News. 17E.

Lovell, G. (October 16, 1991). "Solid ratings for S. J. film festival." The San Jose Mercury News. 5E

Lovell, G. (October 7, 1990). "A film fest for San Jose: the silicon capital tries to mine a little movies gold." The San Jose Mercury News. 17E.

Lovell, G. (October 7, 1990). "Learning from past successes - and failures how to run a local film festival." The San Jose Mercury News. 24E.

von Busack, R. (February 18, 1999). "Old mavericks and a new generation converge at Cinequest." Metro. (On-line).