Chapter 12 Review Questions (Key)
§12.1 Introduction
- Systematic error and random error.
- Parameters are error-free quantifications. Estimates are
error-prone statistics.
- Estimators have
hats. Parameters are "hatless.
- Bias
- Imprecision.
- Valid
- Imprecise
- Random error is balanced (equal number of overestimates and
underestimates), is sample size dependent (less random error in large
samples), and can be dealt with via laws of probability.
§12.2 Random Error
- False. Probability models only address random error.
- False. Both subjective and objective probabilities are based on an
underlying concept of expected frequencies. In addition, they obey the same mathematical laws.
- Confidence intervals and hypothesis tests
§12.3 Systematic Error
- Selection, information, confounding
- False. Nondifferential misclassification biases measures of effect toward
the null or not at all.
- False. Bias away from the null overstates risk.
- Confounding is a distortion in a measure of effect brought
about by extraneous ("lurking") factors.
- (a) Associated with the exposure (b) Independent risk factor for disease (c) not intermediate in the causal
pathway
- Confundere = to mix-up
- Berkson's bias, also know as "Hospital admission rate"
- No. It will tend to have the same amount of bias. (It will have less
random error, however.)
- Recall bias
- Information bias
- When it is not associated with the exposure
-
- It could be considered confounding if the medical indication or the
severity of the condition can be measured and adjusted for in the analysis,
or it might be considered uncontrolled confounding or selection bias because
it acts like a confounder but is a consequence of being "selected"
to get the drug.
-
-