| San José State University |
|---|
|
applet-magic.com Thayer Watkins Silicon Valley & Tornado Alley USA |
|---|
|
Its Nature and Its Proof |
Let A be an n×n matrix of real elements. The determinantal equation defining its eigenvalues is
where I is the n×n identity matrix. This equation in terms of a determinant generates a polynomimal equation p(λ)=0 where p(λ) is called the characteristic polynomial of the matrix. The Cayley-Hamilton Theorem is that if A is substituted for λ in the characteristic polynomial the result is a matrix of zeroes.
Let A be the matrix
| 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 4 |
Then the matrix A−λI is
| 1−λ | 2 |
| 3 | 4−λ |
The determinant of (A−λI) is then
This is the characteristic polynomial of the matrix A. The solutions to the polynomical equation
are the eigenvalues of the matrix A.
Consider now what results when λ is replaced with A and −2 is replaced with −2I.
A² is the matrix
| 7 | 10 |
| 15 | 22 |
Therefore −2I −5A + A² is
| −2−5*1+7 | 0−5*2+10 |
| 0−5*3+15 | −2−5*4+22 |
which evaluates to
| 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 |
Thus, almost mystically, A satisfies its own eigenvalue value equation.
The charactistic polynomial equation is equivalent to the determinantal equation
If A is substituted for Λ in this equation the result is
where O is a matrix of zeroes. Certainly A satisfies the determinantal equation.
Let the eigenvalue equation be expressed in the equivalent form
This removes the ambiguity of the sign of λn in the characteristic equation; it is always 1 for all n.
(To be continued.)
|
HOME PAGE OF Thayer Watkins |