To: Vice Presidents, Deans, and Division Directors
From: President Gail Fullerton
Subject: Position Classification Program
This Presidential Directive supersedes PD 81-09 and applies to positions subject to classification and reclassification throughout the University.
Since 1976, San José State University has had approval authority for all support staff and administrative classification decisions delegated to the President by the Chancellor. With this authority came the responsibility for the University to adhere to the classification and qualifications standards established by the California State University system. It is my responsibility to assure that the principles of classification are consistently and equitably applied throughout the University.
The University Personnel Office provides staff services with respect to the review and classification or reclassification of support staff positions. Detailed information concerning the position classification program and operational procedures is provided in the attachment. Questions concerning the position classification program and the delegation of classification authority should be directed to the University Personnel Office. This information should be shared with all employees.
GF:lvh
Position Classification Program*
San José State University
Presidential Directive 85-06 (Supersedes PD 81-09)
Delegation of Classification Authority
Effective October 1, 1976, the authority for classifying most campus positions that are subject to allocation to the Classification Plan of the California State University (CSU) system was delegated to this University by the Chancellor. This delegation does not include the authority to establish new classes or pay ranges or to modify existing classes or pay ranges. This delegation does not apply to positions in the Management Personnel Plan.
It is the policy of San José State University to provide a Position Classification Program that will uphold the job classification and qualification standards of the CSU system and, through the position classification process, assure that the principle of "equal pay for equal work" is consistently and effectively applied.
There are two objectives of the program:
The President of San José State University has overall responsibility for the Position Classification Program.
* The program outlined here applies to all classifications except Student Services Professional classes in the Student Services Division, Librarians, and positions in the Management Personnel Plan.
The University Personnel Officer is responsible for the administration of such policies, procedures, regulations and guidelines deemed necessary to uphold the classification and qualification standards of the CSU system.
Although classification authority has been delegated to the President, San José State University must maintain the system-wide classification and pay plan. At the same time, the University must recognize valid changes inwork assigned to individuals and adjust classifications appropriately. The position classification review process provides for recognition of substantial and permanent changes in assigned duties and responsibilities that alter the basic nature or level of work performed.
All requests for position review are to be forwarded through appropriate organizational channels before submission to the Personnel Office. Approval to conduct a classification review must be secured from the President or the President's designee for this approval. In the areas of their responsibility, the AVP, EVP, or DSS will be the President's designee for this required approval.
A request for classification review will not be denied if it is apparent that the position has undergone significant change.
However, approval to conduct the review does not mean approval of a reclassification of the position if the review determines that the duties assigned no longer accord with existing classification. It may be determined by management that the assigned duties need to be changed to accord with the existing classification. If this is the outcome, the immediate supervisor will have the responsibility of restructuring the duties assigned to keep them in accord with the position classification.
Possible outcomes of the classification review are three:
The determination of whether the duties assigned accord with the existing classification is the responsibility of the Personnel Office. In those instances in which the assigned duties are determined to exceed the existing classification, the decision regarding whether the duties or the classification should be changed will be made by the President on the recommendation of the Academic Vice President (AVP), the Executive Vice President (EVP), or the Dean of Student Services (DSS), as appropriate.
Initiation of Position Reviews
A position classification review may be generated in one of four ways, as follows:
The immediate supervisor may initiate a classification review. The steps detailed in 1) above will be the same.
When the position is vacant, there will be no position incumbent with whom the supervisor can discuss the job description. The rest of the process remains without change.
The review of classification process should be completed before the job announcement is sent out, so that, if there is a change in the position description and classification, such changes can be properly approved prior to the initiation of the search process.
The Personnel Office will inform the persons occupying affected positions and their supervisors that a position classification review has been mandated by the Chancellor. The remaining steps will be essentially similar to 3) above.
A position classification review is not a review of the performance of the incumbent. It is the set of duties and responsibilities assigned by management to a particular position that is reviewed for its fit with classification standards.
In most cases, a position classification review involves the review of a current position description and comparison of that job description with classification standards. The review may also include discussion with the immediate supervisor and a classification conference with the employee. Classification conferences are typically held at the work site and may include observation of work processes, familiarization with forms, procedures, equipment or facilities, discussions with other departmental personnel, or other appropriate means of obtaining factual information.
In conjunction with the analysis of a given position, it is occasionally necessary to review additional positions in order to clarify the relationship of positions within or outside the organizational unit before a classification determination can be made.
The Personnel Officer is responsible for implementing the following position classification review procedures:
No announcement should be made to either the incumbent or his or her supervisors regarding the outcome of the classification review process at any stage after the Personnel Office has initiated a Form 613 until action has been taken by the President. When the President has acted on the classification, it will be the responsibility of the immediate line supervisor to inform the employee currently occupying the position about the outcome of the position classification review.
An incumbent has the right to appeal the findings of a classification review by the Personnel Office. Such an appeal must be filed with the Personnel Office no later than ten (10) days after the immediate supervisor has informed the incumbent, in writing, that the Personnel Office has determined that the duties and responsibilities assigned are encompassed by the existing position classification.
The appeal of the Personnel Office findings shall include a detailed statement by the incumbent indicating the reasons for disagreement with the classification review determination. The incumbent shall provide a copy of the appeal to the immediate line supervisor.
A designated administrator in the Personnel Office will hold a meeting with the employee no later than twenty-one (21) days after the classification review appeal is filed. The designated administrator should not be the same person who conducted the initial classification review. This administrator will respond in writing to the employee no later than twenty-one (21) days after the meeting with the employee. Such a response shall be final.
Classification review, procedures are not subject to grievance.