EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES
June 7, 2004
Present: Nellen, Donoho, Lessow-Hurley,
Kassing, Veregge, Greathouse, Thames, Van Selst, Ashton, Maldonado-Colon
Absent: Goodman,
Crowley, Heisch, Rascoe, Bros
1. The
Executive Committee discussed and approved the consent calendar.
2. The
Executive Committee discussed the new Task Force on Intercollegiate
Athletics. They have held their first
meeting and everything is going well.
3. Chair
Nellen announced that there is an Academic Freedom Forum planned for Fall
2004. She is working with members of Board
of Academic Freedom and Professional Responsibility (BFR) and others to plan
it.
4. The
Executive Committee discussed searches that will be needed this Fall. A search will need to be conducted for a
replacement for the Dean of Social Sciences and perhaps others.
5. The
Executive Committee discussed the Student Opinion of Teaching Effectiveness (SOTE)
report/update provided by Vice Provost Bill Nance on the costs of the SOTES.
Questions came up about the policy and Chair Nellen said she would get info out
to the Exec Committee members and we’d discuss the topic further at the July
meeting.
6. The
Executive Committee members were given copies of the committee year-end reports
that have been received in the Senate office.
These will be discussed at the Executive Committee meeting scheduled for
July after members have had an opportunity to read them.
7. The
Executive Committee discussed possible agenda items for 2004/2005 to include:
v Strategic Planning with President Yu
v WASC Accreditation
v A new Budget policy
v A new RTP policy
v A new Office Hours policy
v Revisiting the Add/Drop policy
v Scheduling exams and activities for
online courses
v A Student Code of Conduct/Values
Statement
v Continuing to work on GE Guidelines
v Possible new structure for the Campus
Climate/Affirmative Action Committees
v Department Chair policy
v What is General Unit and who should
be a part of it
v SOTES
v Electronic Balloting
v Sanctionable Units
v Recommendations from COIA
v Enrollment Management
v Faculty Development policy
v Policy on moving programs
v Affordable Textbooks
v IT Consultant report
v Mandatory email
v Senate agenda
v Mission Statement for Senate
v Policy on Sabbaticals and
Senators/Committee Chairs
v Professional Development/Lottery
Guidelines
Vice
Chair Donoho asked why item (i) of number 7 above had been skipped. Chair Nellen said, "Eva, Elba, and I
will be discussing the role of the Senate Secretary vs. the role of the Senate
Administrative Analyst. Chair Nellen
said, "Most of the changes are just to update the handbook on who actually
does what. For instance, the handbook
clearly states that the Senate Secretary takes the minutes of the meetings, and
yet Eva currently does this. Vice Chair
Donoho asked, "What about also giving Eva the right to speak up during the
meetings?" Chair Nellen stated that this topic is going to be addressed
and will hopefully be a top priority for O&G.
Senator
Lessow-Hurley asked about item 9 on the agenda – setting dates for the retreat
and other fall events. Chair Nellen said she would email out possible dates
since we won’t have an Executive Committee with all members present during the
summer.
Meeting
was adjourned at 10:40 a.m.