B.A. in Theatre Arts Assessment Model

*Denotes semester classes are to be assessed 

 

Student Learning Outcomes:

Course(s)

Sem/Yr*

Evaluation Instrument(s)

1

Demonstrate a literacy of  language of stage and/or screen; know how to analyze a script, understand the historical and contemporary structure of a script, and the social and political effects of a performance on an audience

TA 10*, 11, 17, 120*, 127

F 06

Written analysis of scripts; critical reviews of productions seen on and off campus; well written and thoroughly documented research papers; exams/quizzes

2

Demonstrate an ability to tell meaningful stories through performance; correlate performance to production; Demonstrate acting skills and development of a character.

TA 17*, 51(A, B, C)*, 110, 112, 113, 116, 117

S 07

Performances in class; tests; laboratory assignments; audition of monologues and critiques by industry professionals;

follow rules for rehearsals; show physical and vocal traits of characters; work effectively as a member an ensemble

3

Communicate information and entertainment to diverse cultures using stage and/or screen; demonstrate sensitive to the processes of and the attitudes held by races, religions, political and social groups that are not their own

TA 10, 116*, 12, 127*

F 07

Critical reviews; in-class productions; final promptbooks and script analysis; exams/quizzes

4

Demonstrate how to plan, perform, produce, write and direct for stage and screen; demonstrate professional-level skills of production; design for and operate contemporary technologies

TA 112*, 113, 116, 128, 153, 154, 163*

 S 08

Performances; write a scene; direct a scene; prepare a professional resume; design costumes, set, and/or lights for a script

5

Demonstrate what type of information is needed for a research question, problem, or issue, and be able to retrieve, evaluate and effectively use such information to produce quality scholarship

TA 120, 121

    

Research paper proposal; bibliography; in-class performances; exam/quizzes



Theatre Arts Assessment Activities Used to Measure How Well students Have Met Learning Objective:

Exams/quizzes: Exams will assess for factual information and concepts from all learning objective categories. Tests may use multiple choice and are convergent—typically they have a single, best answer. Fill-in-the-blank, short answer and essay questions will use selected-response,  short-answer formats, and long development questions in order to  cover the lexicon of course content.

Projects: (performances, designs, audition portfolios, directing books, script analysis papers, rehearsals and productions, etc..) Students may also make formal, oral reports during a semester.

Writing: To enhance written communication skills, papers may be assigned any time throughout the semester in order for students to receive feedback on their writing along the way. Writing assessment forms may be submitted as a coversheet for paper submissions.  In addition, writing will be required during in-class activities and on exams (essay questions), and quizzes.

GENERAL RESEARCH PAPER GRADING POLICY OVERVIEW (obviously not the same for scripts or specific production writing):  In grading your essays on both papers and exams, instructors will be looking for the following qualities:

TYPICAL FORMAT: All papers must be double spaced with a bibliography of sources consulted. Some instructors may ask you to use a version of a course writing assessment form as a coversheet. Your instructor will tell you whether to use either MLA format or traditional footnotes for your citations, but whichever form you select must be used properly and consistently. 

BASIC RESEARCH PAPER ORGANIZATION:Your essay must begin with an introductory paragraph that gives the reader an overview of your essay as a whole and presents a clear thesis statement (a statement of the argument or main point of your paper). The body of your paper must be organized well and sensibly into paragraphs, each discussing a different topic. Overly long paragraphs generally indicate that your topics are too broad. Each paragraph should have a clear topic sentence, and the topics should progress in such a way as to formulate a clear and compelling argument. Your essay must end with a conclusion that not only summarizes your main points but also draws the significance of your argument. 

EVIDENCE: All generalizations must be supported by concrete historical evidence. It is your responsibility to show through explanation how that evidence proves (or does not prove) the argument you are making. Please avoid unsupported generalizations. If your paper is based on a specific set of readings or a book, you should analyze the author's argument. For an essay based on assigned readings, most of the evidence in your paper should come from those readings (a book, articles, or whatever was assigned for the paper). 

CITATIONS: You are expected to use your own words when writing a paper, unless there is some compelling reason to quote directly from a book or article. Be sure to provide a proper footnote or page reference for nay idea or phrase taken from a source other than yourself. A good rule of thumb: You do not need to cite general knowledge, but all factual information, opinions, or direct quotes must be supported by a citation. REMEMBER: Plagiarism will not be tolerated (see the plagiarism/cheating statements below).

GRAMMAR, SPELLING, PROOFREADING:Good papers are edited and re-written several times by their authors. Poor grammar and spelling generally indicate hasty, ill-prepared work and will lead to a lower grade. You may work with a tutor from the Academic Resource Center to improve your writing. Remember: Clear writing generally reflects clear thinking! 

MISCELLANEOUS: History analyzes what happened in the past. Therefore, you should not use the present tense in your papers. As an exception to this rule, every time you read a book or article, you read it in the present. Therefore, the general rule is: The author tells us (present tense) what happened (past tense). 

AUDIENCE: Your audience is a well-educated lay person who does not know very much about the specific topic you are writing about. The audience for your paper is not your professor. Be sure to give enough background to situate your topic in its broader context. 

CONTENT:  Does the essay answer the question thoroughly? Have you considered all aspects of the problem? Have you demonstrated a thorough understanding of readings and lectures? Did you support your main points with specific historical examples? Have you thoroughly and carefully researched your topic? A papers are well organized, thoughtful, clear, and concise. Their arguments are well supported by specific examples. In addition, we look for creative analyses and new ideas when evaluating essays.

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: You are welcome to review SJSU's Policy on Academic Integrity (downloadable PDF file). Or you can go to San Jose State's Office of Student Conduct and Ethical Development for more information.  Academic integrity is essential to the mission of San José State University.  As such, students are expected to perform their own work (except when collaboration is expressly permitted by the course instructor) without the use of any outside resources.  Students are not permitted to use old tests, quizzes when preparing for exams, nor may they consult with students who have already taken the exam. When practiced, academic integrity ensures that all students are fairly graded. Violations to the Academic Integrity Policy undermine the educational process and will not be tolerated.  It also demonstrates a lack of respect for oneself, fellow students and the course instructor and can ruin the university's reputation and the value of the degrees it offers. We all share the obligation to maintain an environment which practices academic integrity.  Violators of the Academic Integrity Policy will be subject to failing this course and being reported to the Office of Judicial Affairs for disciplinary action which could result in suspension or expulsion from San José State University.

Cheating: At SJSU, cheating is the act of obtaining or attempting to obtain credit for academic work through the use of any dishonest, deceptive, or fraudulent means. Cheating at SJSU includes but is not limited to:  Copying in part or in whole, from another's test or other evaluation instrument; Submitting work previously graded in another course unless this has been approved by the course instructor or by departmental policy. Submitting work simultaneously presented in two courses, unless this has been approved by both course instructors or by departmental policy.  Altering or interfering with grading or grading instructions; Sitting for an examination by a surrogate, or as a surrogate; any other act committed by a student in the course of his or her academic work which defrauds or misrepresents, including aiding or abetting in any of the actions defined above. 

Plagiarism: At SJSU plagiarism is the act of representing the work of another as one's own (without giving appropriate credit) regardless of how that work was obtained, and submitting it to fulfill academic requirements. Plagiarism at SJSU includes but is not limited to: The act of incorporating the ideas, words, sentences, paragraphs, or parts thereof, or the specific substances of another's work, without giving appropriate credit, and representing the product as one's own work; and representing another's artistic/scholarly works such as musical compositions, computer programs, photographs, painting, drawing, sculptures, or similar works as one's own.  Double-dipping: If you would like to include in your papers any material you have submitted (or plan to submit) to another class, please note that SJSU's Integrity Policy requires approve by both instructors.

FOR STUDENTS WHO NEED ADDITIONAL ACADEMIC HELP: San Jose State University encourages qualified persons with disabilities to participate in its programs and activities. If you anticipate needing any type of assistance in this course, please tell the instructor as soon as possible so that we can make the necessary accommodations. Presidential Directive 97-03 describes the University's policies and guidelines for securing accommodations for students with disabilities, as well as the procedures for resolving disputes. It is the purpose of this directive to assure that SJSU continues to comply with federal and state legislation and California State University policies regarding the provision of services to students with disabilities.



PAPER Grading Criteria
PARTICIPATION Grading Criteria

A paper:

  • is not handed in late
  • meets every general and specific requirement of the assignment
  • asks challenging, reflective, thoughtful, pertinent, deep questions
  • explores, in depth, detailed, provocative, or innovative answers to its questions
  • is concise and focused on the topic; it contains no padding
  • is not a book report and does not merely re-state information
  • contains very few grammar and punctuation mistakes
  • •displays careful editing and revision with no careless mistakes

A student:

  • contributes frequently and consistently during class
  • contributes high-quality ideas and comments in class
  • listens to the comments of others and responds to those comments
  • gives concrete examples and precise analogies to help us understand
  • asks deep and pointed questions
  • frequently refers to the text for support
  • sincerely attempts to understand answers and to formulate questions

B paper:

  • could have been a better grade, but is 1 day late
  • meets most general and specific requirements of the assignment
  • asks reflective, thoughtful questions
  • explores possible answers in some depth and detail
  • is concise and focused on the topic
  • contains little book-report-style material
  • contains several grammar and punctuation mistakes
  • displays careful revision and few careless mistakes

B student:

  • contributes most classes
  • generally adds good-quality comments and questions to the specific conversation
  • often gives relevant examples to help us understand
  • consistently listens well and responds to other students comments and questions
  • refers to the text or re-phrases the ideas in the texts
  • shows a sincere interest in the texts and discussions

C paper:

  • could have been a better grade, but is 2 days late
  • meets only the minimum requirements of the assignment
  • is merely average work
  • asks obvious questions without exploring un-obvious answers
  • is wordy, vague, unfocused, or unclear
  • contains many grammar, style, and punctuation errors
  • displays careless or no editing or revision

 C student:

  • contributes generally to a few classes
  • gives only short or shallow answers to questions
  • shows little enthusiasm for class texts or discussions
  • is often late for class or misses class

F paper:

  • is 3 days or more late
  • meets neither the general nor the specific requirements of the assignment
  • contains any plagiarized material (the words, phrases, sentences, structures, or ideas of another author)
  • fails to meet the assigned length
  • contains so many grammar, editing, and style errors that I cannot read it
  • has improper formatting (too-wide margins, wrong font size, too much space between paragraphs)

F student:

  • rarely contributes to discussions, often not
  •  contributing at all in several classes
  • is frequently and consistently late for class
  • misses 5 or more classes
  • is discourteous, disruptive, or antagonistic in class
  • contributes only sloppy, haphazard, and shallow comments and questions
  • shows no enthusiasm for or attention to class texts or discussions