Breadcrumb Navigation

print email

This page provides information for students enrolled in URBP 298A and URBP 298B with all advisors for Fall 2009 (Bossard, Ezzet-Lofstrom, Kos, Nixon, and Salazar).

Contents of this page:

• Greensheets
• Faculty contact information
• Prerequisites for enrolling in URBP 298A
• Information for URBP 298A students
• Information for URBP 298B students
• Sample 298 reports
• Resources on research methods and writing

Course greensheets for Fall 2009

• URBP 298A greensheet [.doc]
• URBP 298B greensheet [.doc]

Faculty contact information and office hours for Fall 2009

Prerequisites for enrolling in URBP 298A for Spring 2010

To enroll in URBP 298A, the first semester of the 298 process, students must meet two prerequisites. First, students must pass the WST if they joined the MUP program in Fall 2006 or later. In addition, all students must complete a Preliminary Proposal by the due date. Follow the steps below to complete this process and obtain an enrollment code for the course.

Step 1: Review the URBP 298 course web site to learn what will be expected of you.

Browse through this 298 course website.  In particular, familiarize yourself with the Research Proposal, IRB, and Literature Review assignments. The guidelines for the assignments may change slightly for the Spring 2010 semester, but the assignments will remain substantially the same.

Step 2: Request an URBP 298 advisor.

Each student in URBP 298 works with a faculty advisor. In Spring 2010, the advisors will be Roxanne Ezzet-Lofstrom, Rick Kos, Hilary Nixon, and Dayana Salazar.

If you have identified a preferred advisor, contact him/her directly to say you hope to work with him/her. If space is not available with that advisor, then ask to be put on his/her waiting list. Alternatively, you can contact Prof. Salazar, who will be the URBP 298 coordinator for Spring 2010, and ask to be put on a general waiting list for an advisor.

Please note that the department cannot guarantee who your advisor will be until the first week of the semester. However, we make every effort to match students with their preferred advisor.

Step 3: Complete assigned readings on how to develop a research question and bibliography.

Read Chapters 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Kate L. Turabian’s A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, seventh edition. Note that you must read the seventh edition, which is a newer version than some of you may already own.

Step 4: Prepare a Preliminary Proposal.

Using what you have learned from the Turabian readings, prepare a preliminary proposal that contains the following 9 items:

1. A statement that you have passed the WST or a statement that you were admitted to the MUP program before Fall 2006 and so are exempt from the WST requirement.
    
2. The proposed title of your 298 report.
    
3. Your research question in one or two sentences (no more).
    
4. A statement of the audience for whom you plan to write.
    
5. A list of all courses you have taken that have prepared you to research this topic.
    
6. An explanation of why your question is an important one to study (one or two pages maximum).

To prove that your question is an important one, worth studying, you must answer for readers the "who cares?" question. To do so, this section must explain why answering your specific research question will provide valuable information to improve planning practice in general and/or the conditions within a specific community. In writing this section of the proposal, think both about the relevance of your general topic and also about the relevance of your specific question.

1. A description of the methods you will use to gather the data needed to answer your research question (one paragraph minimum).
   
   Examples of methods you might use are conducting interviews, surveying people, or analyzing a pre-existing data set like the census, etc. To get a sense of methods that other 298 students have used, review the sample 298 research proposals by Donlon, Fauria, and Kim that are posted at this 298 website.
   
   Once you decide you may use a particular method (e.g., surveys), you should review at least one textbook with advice on using that method. If you are using quantitative methods, for example, you can review relevant texts you read in URBP 204A or URBP 204B. If you plan to do a policy or program analysis, you should review relevant texts from URBP 236. For both quantitative and qualitative methods, you will find a good list of suggested readings at the UC Berkeley Environmental Design Library's website Preparing for Thesis and Dissertation Research.
    
2. An annotated bibliography of at least 30 sources on your topic.
   
   For each item in the bibliography, include the full source citation formatted in Turabian bibliography style, a summary of the author’s main points in 100 words or less that is written in your own words, and a one-sentence statement of how you envision using this information in writing your Planning Report.
   
   At least 10 of the 30 items must be research articles published in peer-reviewed journals. None of the required 30 items may be newspaper articles, though you may include such articles in addition to the required 30 items.
   
   If you need a refresher on how to find planning-related research articles, see the 298 handout on on-line research tips.
    
3. A list of all on-line databases or library catalogues that you have searched, plus a list of the search terms you used at each one.
   
   Library catalogues you may want to use include the SJSU MLK Library's catalogue, as well as the University of California's Melvyl catalogue.  As for databases, there are dozens that may be useful to you, but common ones used by planning students include Academic Search Premier, ScienceDirect.com, and Web of Science.
   
   If you were using ScienceDirect.com and looking for research on traffic circles, your entry would look something like this: "ScienceDirect.com: I searched various combinations of the following keywords: traffic circle, roundabout, traffic calming, safety, accidents."
    

Step 5: Submit the Preliminary Proposal to an advisor by January 15, 2010.

By the due date (TBA), email your Preliminary Proposal to the advisor with whom you hope to work. If you have not yet identified a specific advisor with whom you wish to work, then submit your proposal to Professor Salazar, who will be the URBP 298 coordinator for Spring 2010.

Step 6: Obtain an enrollment code for URBP 298A.

To register for URBP 298A, you need an enrollment code. During the first week of classes, the department will distribute add codes so that you can register for URBP 298A (assuming that your preliminary proposal is turned in on time and is of acceptable quality). Please do not ask for an add code before the first week of classes, as the department will not give them out until that time.

Information for URBP 298A students

Class meeting times for Fall 2009 (subject to change with notice)

The class will meet on Mondays evenings, from 7:15 - 10:00 p.m, in (room TBD).  The first meeting will be held on August 24.  The other meeting dates will most likely be August 31, September 14, September 21, and November 16.

Assignments for Fall 2009

• Research Proposal [.doc] (assignments #1, #2, and #4)

  Here are some sample proposals written by URBP 298 students that will give you some ideas of how to construct your own: Donlon [.pdf], Fauria [.pdf], Kim [.pdf]
   

• Preparation of a draft and final IRB application (assignments #3 and 5)
  
  You can read about the IRB process and review the forms used to put together an application at http://www.sjsu.edu/gradstudies/irb/.
  
  Sample IRB proposals you can use as models are: Salazar example [.pdf], Nixon example [.pdf], Mathur example [.pdf], and Agrawal example [.pdf]
  
• Literature review [.doc] (assignments #6 & #7)

  Here are some well-developed literature reviews written by prior 298 students that may give you ideas of how to construct your own literature review: Hebela [.pdf] and Hodge [.pdf].  Note that when these were written, the instructions for the assignment were somewhat different. In addition, you might find this literature review example useful. It was written by a student in URBP 200, but generally follows the same format as the URBP 298A assignment: Active Commuting to School [.pdf].

Key due dates for Fall 2009

Assignment	Due Date
1. Draft #1 of Research Proposal	9/8
2. Draft #2 of Research Proposal	9/21
3. IRB Application	9/28
4. Final Research Proposal	10/5
5. Draft Literature Review	10/26
6. Final Literature Review	11/9
7. Draft report sections	12/8

Class meeting topics and handouts for Fall 2009 (subject to change with notice)

August 24 - Class 1

Lecture: Introductions; overview of the 298 process and greensheet; explanation of the research proposal assignment, framing the research question

Handouts:

• Research questions [.pdf]
• On-line research tips [.pdf]

August 31 - Class 2

Lecture: Conducting case studies; conducting interviews; the IRB process

Readings:

• Read about the IRB process and review the forms used to put together an application at http://www.sjsu.edu/gradstudies/irb/
• Skim these four sample IRB proposals: Mathur example [.pdf], Nixon example [.pdf], Salazar example [.pdf], and Agrawal example [.pdf]

Handouts

• Sample interview questionnaire [.pdf]
• Sample interview recruitment email [.pdf]
• IRB Presentation [.pdf] (slides from Professor Nixon's presentation)
• Case Study Methods Presentation [.pdf] (slides from Professor Nixon's presentation)
• Interview Methods Presentation [.pdf] (slides from Professor Nixon's presentation)

September 14 - Class 3

Lecture: Analyzing qualitative data (i.e., interview notes or primary documents); how to take notes

Class materials

• Link to the Center for Disease Control and Preventions's EZ-Text software
• On-line bibliographic software available through the SJSU library: RefWorks (access the SJSU library -- see the RefWorks link under "Research Help")
• How to Take Notes and Qualitative Data Analysis [.pdf] (slides from Professor Ezzet-Lofstrom's presentation)

September 21 - Class 4

Lecture: Explanation of the literature review assignment; review of when and how to cite sources

Workshop: Discuss draft research proposals

Handouts

• Lecture slides from Professor Nixon's presentation on conducting literature reviews [.pdf]
• Lecture slides from Professor Nixon's brief overview of Turabian [.pdf]

November 16 - Class 5

Lecture: Review of document design principles; tips on using advanced MS Word features to format a report; what to expect in URBP 298B

Handouts

• Tips on formatting MS Word documents [.pdf]

Information for URBP 298B Students: Key due dates for Fall 2009

Sample 298 reports

See the URBP 298 reports that have received an honors designation:

• Work/Live Development in Sacramento, by Laura Russell [.pdf]
• The University Campus and the Urban Fabric: Mending the University District, by Katja N. Irvin [.pdf]
• Estimating Time-Based Bus Service Areas Using the Time-Based Bus Service Area Tool, by Chao-Lun Cheng [.pdf]
• Sex Businesses in San Francisco: How the City Could and Should Regulate Where They Locate, by Seon Joo Kim [.pdf]
• Do Central Business District Redevelopment Investments Have a Positive Influence on Surrounding Neighborhoods, by Amy M. Fauria [.pdf]

Resources on Research Methods and Writing

There are many good resources available on the web that can help you to develop your thesis, organize your paper, cite sources properly, and such.  A small subset appears below here.

• How to Write a Literature Review: This handout from the Writing Center at the University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill provides a very helpful description of the purpose of a literature view, as well as the steps you take to write one.
   
• Distinguishing Scholarly Journals from Other Periodicals: This handout from the Olin and Uris Libraries, Cornell University, explains how to identify scholarly or "academic" research.
   
• Critical Evaluation of Resources: This handout from the Library at the University of California at Berkeley suggests strategies to evaluate the credibility and usefulness of materials you find on the web or in print.
   
• How to Read a Book: This handout from the School of Information at the University of Michigan suggests a system for reading books critically and efficiently.  Many of the ideas apply equally well to articles or research reports.
• Revising: This handout from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Writing Center suggests strategies for editing and proofreading draft writing.
   

You will also find many recommended books on writing in the course materials for Asha W. Agrawal's version of URBP 213.  See the suggested readings at the bottom of the URBP 213 course home page and also the required readings on the URBP 213 course syllabus.