Measures of Student Achievement

Tuition and Fees

Tuition and fees are calculated for one full academic year (Fall and Spring semesters) and are based on a full-time course-load of 12 units.

  • In-state residents: $8,600
  • Out-of-state residents: $17,300

For a complete list of student fees and for a per-credit-hour breakdown of tuition rates, please refer to the University Bursar’s website at: http://www.sjsu.edu/bursar/fees_due_dates/tuition_fees/

 

Graduation and Retention Data

Academic Year

Number Enrolled

1-Yr Retention Rate

3-Yr Graduation Rate**

5-Yr Graduation Rate**

2006-2007

41

83%

41%

62%

2007-2008

56

68%

52%

90%

2008-2009

52

85%

56%

82%

2009-2010

32*

94%

78%

84%

2010-2011

24*

81%

50%

-

2011-2012

49

90%

82%

-

2012-2013

39

85%

-

-

2013-2014

53

93%

-

-

*SJSU put severe restrictions on the total number of students that could be admitted to graduate programs during these academic years.

**SJSU does not prepare 4-year graduation rates. Our program offers a part-time option; students have up to 7 years to complete the MUP program according to university policy. Students on an entirely part-time (≤ 6 units per semester) degree path would take a minimum of 4 years to complete the program.

Academic Year

Degrees Awarded

2006-2007

17

2007-2008

26

2008-2009

32

2009-2010

39

2010-2011

57

2011-2012

31

2012-2013

36

2013-2014

41

 

AICP Exam Data (Pass Rate within 3 Years of Graduation)

To become a certified planner, members of the American Planning Association (APA) must meet certain education and experience requirements and pass the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Exam. The pass rate presented here is the percentage of test takers from SJSU who pass the examination within 3 years of graduating from our MUP program.

Graduation Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Number taking exam

4

4

1

3

1

Pass rate

75%

75%

100%

66%

100%

AICP Exam pass rate data are collected by the APA. For a complete list of pass rates for all PAB-accredited institutions see: https://www.planning.org/certification/passrates/

 

Employment Rate of Graduates Within 1 Year of Graduation

 

Full-time

Part-time

2013   Calendar Year

 

 

Graduates

20

23

Responses to survey

12

14

Employment within 1 year of graduation

 

 

Planning/planning related job

92%

64%

Not employed in a planning/planning related job

9%

21%

Pursuing advanced degree

0%

0%

Unemployed

0%

1%

 

 

 

2012 Calendar Year

 

 

Graduates

4

20

Responses to survey

3

16

Employment within 1 year of graduation

 

 

Planning/planning related job

67%

69%

Not employed in a planning/planning related job

33%

31%

Pursuing advanced degree

0%

0%

Unemployed

0%

0%

 

 

 

2011 Calendar Year

 

 

Graduates

11

28

Responses to survey

6

16

Employment within 1 year of graduation

 

 

Planning/planning related job

50%

81%

Not employed in a planning/planning related job

50%

13%

Pursuing advanced degree

0%

0%

Unemployed

0%

1%

 

 

 

2010 Calendar Year

 

 

Graduates

18

37

Responses to survey

7

14

Employment within 1 year of graduation

 

 

Planning/planning related job

57%

64%

Not employed in a planning/planning related job

43%

34%

Pursuing advanced degree

0%

0%

Unemployed

0%

0%

 

Student Achievement

The Department of Urban & Regional Planning assesses student achievement through three distinct mechanisms:

  1. Evaluation by internship supervisor;
  2. Evaluation of the comprehensive planning report using a common rubric;
  3. Performance of graduates on the AICP exam.

 

1. Internship Supervisor Evaluation Data

Every student who graduates with a MUP degree must complete a minimum of 180 of professional work experience. Internship supervisors are required to evaluate the student on a wide variety of planning knowledge and skills. A summary of internship evaluations for students is shown in the table below.

 

Criteria

2012-2013 Student Performance*

2013-2014 Student Performance*

Ability to work effectively on a team

4.8

4.7

Ability to compose written reports and memos

4.7

4.6

Ability to make an oral presentation

4.3

4.4

Ability to interface with the public or clients

4.7

4.6

Ability to solve problems and think creatively

4.7

4.6

Initiative and ability to work independently

4.7

4.7

Knowledge expected of an entry-level employee

4.8

4.6

Understanding of professional planning issues

4.5

4.6

Ability to synthesize planning knowledge and apply it to actual planning problems

4.7

4.6

* Average student performance on each criterion on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating “very high performance”

 

2. Evaluation of Comprehensive Planning Report

Every student who graduates from our MUP program completes a comprehensive professional planning report. This independent research project is evaluated by department faculty using a common rubric. A summary of student achievement on the culminating professional report for all students graduating in the 2012-2013 academic year is shown in the table below.

 

Criteria

2012-13

Average Score

2013-14 Average Score

Outcome 1. Demonstrates ability to conceptualize problems from complex, real world situations so the problems are meaningful to clients, and are research worthy. (Students must receive a minimum score of 8 out of 12 to pass.)

9.9

 

10.1

1A.  Are the research questions and/or goals well defined and clearly stated? (2 point max.)

1.7

 

1.9

1B.  Does the author demonstrate in-depth familiarity with relevant literature on the subject? (6 points max.)

5.0

5.1

1C.  Is the methodology appropriate to answer the research question(s)? (4 points max.)

3.2

 

3.2

 

 

 

Outcome 2. Demonstrates ability to collect, analyze, and synthesize information from multiple sources. (Students must receive a minimum score of 10 out of 16 to pass.)

12.5

 

12.7

2A. Is the data collected sufficient in quality and depth to answer the research question? (6 points max.)

4.8

4.7

2B.  Is the analysis direct, competent, and appropriate? (6 points max.)

4.6

4.8

2C. Are the conclusions sophisticated and based on the results of the analysis, as a logical extension of the findings? (2 points max.)

1.5

 

1.6

2D.  Does the author show how his/her analysis and findings fit into the larger context of the literature and current professional practice? (2 points max.)

1.6

1.6

 

 

 

Outcome 3. Demonstrates ability to communicate effectively in writing and by expressing concepts in visual terms. (Students must receive a minimum score of 8 out of 12 to pass.)

10.1

10.4

3A.  Is the material logically organized, so that a reader can easily follow the writer’s train of thought? (4 points max.)

3.5

3.4

3B.  Is the writing grammatically correct and free of typos? (2 points max.)

1.6

 

1.8

3C.  Do tables and figures add useful/important information for the reader? (2 points max.)

1.7

1.7

3D.  Is the report attractive and professional in appearance? (2 points max.)

1.7

1.7

3E.   Are citations included where appropriate, and are footnotes and bibliography properly formatted? (2 points max.)

1.7

1.8

 

 

 

Total Rubric Score (Students must receive a minimum score of 26 out of 40 to pass.)

32.5

33.2

 

3. Performance on AICP Exam

A small minority of MUP graduates take the AICP exam.  The table below summarizes AICP exam performance of SJSU graduates compared to national averages. The data cover examinations that occurred between 2008 and May 2014.

 

Section

Max. Score Possible

National Mean

SJSU Mean

1. History, Theory & Law

23

18

18

2. Plan Making & Implementation

45

36

34

3. Functional Areas of Practice

38

32

29

4. Spatial Areas of Practice

22

17

17

5. Public Participation & Social Justice

15

11

11

6. AICP Code of Ethics

7

6

6

Overall Exam Score

75

59

58