San José State University |
---|
applet-magic.com Thayer Watkins Silicon Valley, Tornado Alley & the Gateway to the Rockies USA |
---|
Magnetic Moment and Spin of an Electron |
---|
In 1922 the physicists Otto Stern and Walther Gerlach ejected a beam of silver atoms into a sharply varying magnetic field. The beam separated into two parts. In 1926 Samuel A. Goudsmit and George E. Uhlenbeck showed that this separation could be explained by the valence electrons of the silver atoms having a spin that is oriented in either of two directions. It has been long asserted that this so-called spin is not literally particle spin. It is often referred to as intrinsic spin whatever that might mean. However here in the material that follows it is accepted that the magnet moment of any particle is due to its actual spinning and the spin rate can be computed from its measured magnetic moment.
The magnetic moment of an electron, measured in Bohr magneton units, is −9.2740. The Bohr magneton is defined as
where e is the unit of electrical charge, h is the reduced Planck's constant, m_{e} is the rest mass of an electron and c is the speed of light. Thus the magneton has different dimensions in the different systems of units. In the SI system it has the dimensions of energy per unit time (Joules per second).
For an electron
Aage Bohr and Ben Mottleson found nuclei rotations satisfy the h√I(I+1) rule, where I is an integer
representing the number of degrees of freedom of the rotating object. The number of degrees of freedom
for a sphere is a bit uncertain. It could be three for rotations about three orthogonal axes. It could be just one
for a charged sphere.
The angular momentum according the Bohr-Mottelson Rule is
Thus
Thus, this suggests that the number of degrees of freedom of the charged spherical electron is 4. There is evidence that the number of degrees of freedom for a charged sphere is 1 or 3. Four degrees of freedom would require a torus. One degree of freedom would be rotation as a vortex ring. A second degree of freedom would be rotation as a wheel. Another two degrees of freedom would come as the flipping of a coin about two orthogonal axes.
In another study it was found that the relativistic angular momentum of a spherical particle of radius R and mass m_{0} spining at ω radians per second is given by
where β_{m} is average tangential velocity on the sphere.
The solution can be found in terms of λ=β_{m}^{2/3} where λ is the solution to the equation
where σ=(m_{0}cR/L)^{2/3}.
The first step toward a solution for an electron is the evaluation of the parameter σ. The immediate problem is what would be the radius of an electron? Some physicists are prone to declaring particles to be spatially points despite the fact a charged point particle would have infinite energy. Thus there is not enough energy in the entire Universe, even if all of its mass were converted to energy, to create a single charged point particle. Any evidence for a point particle is equally well evidence for a charged spherical figure: surface, shell or ball.
It is quite plausible that the mass densities of particles are essentually the same. Then the ratio of the volumes of two types of particles would be the same as the ratio of their masses. The volumes are proportional to the cubes of their radii so the ratio of their radii would be equal to the cube root of the ratio of their masses.
For the electron and the proton this is
Since R_{P} = 0.84x10^{−15} m
To get the solution for λ by iteration let λ_{n} be the n-th iterate. Then
The iteration can be started at λ_{0}=1.
The iteration quickly converges to λ=0.99963 63 and thus β_{m}=0.999445.
This is the mean relative tangential velocity. The relationship between the mean and maximum tangentential veocities for a spherical ball at velocities far below the speed of light is
But at velocities close to the speed of light
For the electron v_{max} is very close to the speed of light.
This means an electron is rotating at a rate of
This is an increditably high rate but it is what it would have to be to generate its measured magnetic moment. It is comparable to the high rates found for nuclei in general; i.e., 4.74x10^{21} rotations per second. See Nuclear Rotation. .
The relativistic method of computing the rotation rate handled the problem that it might imply the matter of the material of the electron could be traveling faster than the speed of light. The general problem of the determination of rotation rates taking into account Special Relativity is dealt with in Relativistic Angular Momentum.
Taking into account the relativistic nature of angular momentum the measured magnetic moment of a electron is consistent with it deriving from it being a rotating spherical electrostatic charge. Its computed rate of rotation is about 5.663x10^{22} times per second.
HOME PAGE OF Thayer Watkins |