San José State University|
Department of Economics
& Tornado Alley
to the XXth Congress of the Communist
Party of the U.S.S.R.
Comrades! The cult of the individual acquired such monstrous size chiefly because Stalin himself, using all conceivable methods, supported the glorification of his own person. This is supported by numerous facts. One of the most characteristic examples of Stalin's self-glorification and of his lack of even elementary modesty is the edition of his Short Biography, which was published in 1948.
This book is an expression of the most dissolute flattery, an example of making a man into a godhead, of transforming him into an infallible sage, "the greatest, leader," "sublime strategist of all times and nations."
Finally no other words could be found with which to lift Stalin up to the heavens. . We need not give here examples of the loathsome adulation filling this book. All we need to add is that they all were approved and edited by Stalin personally and some of them were added in his own handwriting to the draft text of the book.
What did Stalin consider essential to write into this book? Did he want to cool the ardor of his flatterers who were composing his Short Biography? No! He marked the very places where he thought that the praise of his services was insufficient. Here are some examples characterizing Stalin's activity, added in Stalin's own hand:
In this fight against the skeptics and capitulators, the Trotskyites, Zinovievites, Bukharinites and Kamenevites, there was definitely welded together, after Lenin's death, that leading core of the Party . . . that upheld the great banner of Lenin, rallied the Party behind Lenin's behests and brought the Soviet people into the broad road of industrializing the country and collectivizing the rural economy. The leader of this core and the guiding force of the Party and the State was Comrade Stalin.
And further, writes Stalin:
Stalin's military mastership was displayed both in defense and offense. Comrade Stalin's genius enabled him to divine the enemy's plans and defeat them. The battles in which Comrade Stalin directed the Soviet armies are brilliant examples of operational military skill.
Thus writes Stalin himself. Then he adds:
Although he performed his task of leader of the Party and the people with consummate skill and enjoyed the unreserved support of the entire Soviet people, Stalin never allowed his work to be marred by the slightest hint of vanity, conceit or self-adulation.
And one additional fact from the same Short Biography of Stalin. As is known, The Short Course of the History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) was written by a commission of the Party Central Committee. This book, parenthetically, was also permeated with the cult of the individual and was written by a designated group of authors. This fad was reflected in the following formulation on the proof copy of the Short Biography of Stalin:
A commission of the Central Committee, All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), under the direction of Comrade Stalin and with his most active personal participation, has prepared a Short Course of the History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolshevik)
But even this phrase did not satisfy Stalin; the following sentence replaced it in the final version of theShort Biography:
In 1938 appeared the book, History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolshevik:), Short Course, written by Comrade Stalin and approved by a commission of the Central Committee, All Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks):"
After Stalin's death the Central Committee of the Party began to implement a policy of explaining concisely and consistently that it is impermissible and foreign to the spirit of Marxism-Leninism to elevate one person, to transform him into a superman possessing supernatural characteristics akin to those of a god. Such a man supposedly know everything, sees everything, thinks for everyone, can do anything, is infallible in his behavior.
Such a belief about a man, and specifically about Stalin, was cultivated among us for many years. Stalin's willfulness vis-a-vis the Party and its Central Committee be came fully evident after the XVIIth Party Congress which took place in 1934. It was determined that of the 139 members and candidates of the Party's Central Committee who were elected at the XVIIth Congress; 98 persons, i.e., 70 percent, were arrested and shot (mostly in 1937- 1938).
The same fate met not only the Central Committee members but also the majority of the delegates to the XVIIth Party Congress. Of 1,966 delegates with either voting or advisory rights, 1,108 persons were arrested on charges of anti-revolutionary crimes, i.e., decidedly more than a majority. This very fact shows how absurd, wild and contrary to common sense were the charges of counter-revolutionary crimes made out, as we now see, against a majority of participants at the XVIIth Party Congress.
Thus Stalin had sanctioned in the name of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) the most brutal violation of socialist legality, torture and oppression, which led as we have seen to the slandering and self-accusation of innocent people. The power accumulated in the hands of one person, Stalin, led to serious consequences during the Great Patriotic War. When we look at many of our novels, films and historical "scientific studies," the role of Stalin in the Patriotic War appears to be entirely improbable. Stalin had foreseen everything. The Soviet Army, on the basis of a strategic plan prepared by Stalin long before, used the tactics of so-called "active defense," i.e., tactics which, as we know, allowed the Germans to come up to Moscow and Stalingrad. Using such tactics the Soviet Army, supposedly, thanks only to Stalin's genius; turned to the offensive and subdued the enemy.
During the war and after the war Stalin put forward the thesis that the tragedy which our nation experienced in the first part of the war was the result of the "unexpected" attack of the Germans against the Soviet Union. But, Comrades, this is completely untrue. In this connection we cannot forget, for instance, the following fact Shortly before the invasion of the Soviet Union by the Hitlerite army, Kirponos, who was Chief of the Kiev Special Military District (he was later killed at the front), wrote to Stalin that the German armies were at the Bug River, were preparing for an attack and in the very near future would probably start their offensive. In this connection Kirponos proposed that a strong defense be organized, that 300,000 people be evacuated from the border areas and that several strong points be organized there: antitank ditches, trenches for the soldiers, etc.
Moscow answered this proposition with the assertion that this would be a provocation, that no preparatory defensive work should be undertaken at the borders, that the Germans were not to be given any pretext for the initiation of military action against us. Thus, our borders were insufficiently prepared to repel the enemy.
When the Fascist armies had actually invaded Soviet territory and military operations began, Moscow issued the order that the German fire was not to be returned. Why? It was because Stalin, despite evident facts, thought that the war had not yet started, that this was only a provocative action on the part of several undisciplined sections of the German army, and that our reaction might serve as a reason for the Germans to begin the war.
The following fact is also known. On the eve of the invasion of the territory of the Soviet Union by the Hitlerite army a certain German citizen crossed our border and stated that the German armies had received orders to start the offensive against the Soviet Union on the night of June 22, at 3 o'clock. Stalin was informed about this immediately, but even this warning was ignored.
As you see, everything was ignored: warnings of certain army com-, manders, declarations of deserters from the enemy army, and even the open hostility of the enemy. Is this an example of the alertness of the Chief of the Party and of the state at this particularly significant historical moment?
Very grievous consequences, especially in reference to the beginning of the war, followed Stalin's annihilation of many military commanders and political workers during 1937-1941 because of his suspiciousness, and through slanderous accusations. All the more monstrous are the acts whose initiator was Stalin and which are rude violations of the basic Leninist principles of the nationalitv policy of the Soviet state. We refer to the mass deportations from their native places of whole nations, together with all Communists Komsomols without any exception; this deportation action was not dictated by any military considerations.
Thus, already at the end of 1943, when there occurred a permanent breakthrough at the fronts of the Great Patriotic War benefiting Soviet Union, a decision was taken and executed concerning the deportation of all the Karachai from the lands on which they lived. In the same period, at the end of December 1943, the same lot befel whole population of the Autonomous Kalmyk Republic In March all the Chechen and Ingush peoples were deported and the Chec-Ingush Autonomous Republic was liquidated. In April i944, all Balkars were deported to faraway places from the territory of the Kalbino-Balkar Autonomous Republic and the Republic itself was renamed the Autonomous Kabardin Republic. The Ukrainians avoided meeting this fate only because there were too many of them and there was no place to which to deport them. Otherwise, he would have deported them also.
We must state that after the war the situation became even more complicated. Stalin became even more capricious, irritable and bizaar, in particular his suspicion grew. His persecution mania reached unbellieveable dimensions. Many workers were becoming enemies before his very eyes. After the war Stalin separated himself from the coll even more. Everything was decided by him alone without any a consideration for anyone or anything.
Let us also recall the "Affair of the Doctor-Plotters." He issued oders to arrest a group of eminent Soviet medical specialists He personally issued advice on the conduct of the investigation and method of interrogation of the arrested persons. He said that the academician Vinogradov should be put in chains, another one should beaten. Present at this Congress as a delegate is the former Ministry of State Security, Comrade Ignatiev. Stalin told him curtly, "If you do not obtain confessions from the doctors we will shorten you by a head. (Tumult in the hall.)
Stalin personally called the investigative judge, gave him instructions, advised him on which investigative methods should be used, these methods were simple -beat, beat and, once again, beat.
Shortly after the doctors were arrested we members of the Political Bureau received protocols with the doctors' confessions of guilt. Upon distributing these protocols Stalin told us, "You are blind like young kittens; what will happen without me? The country will perish because you do not know how to recognize enemies."
In organizing the various dirty and shameful cases, a very base role was played by the rabid enemy of our Party, an agent of a foreign in telligence service Beria who had stolen into Stalin's confidence.
Baria was unmasked by the Party's Central, Committee shortly after Stalin's death. As a result of the particularly detailed legal proceeding it was established that Beria had committed monstrous crimes and Beria was shot. '
The question arises why Beria, who had liquidated tens of thousana of Party and Soviet workers, was not unmasked during Stalin's life? He was not unmasked earlier because he had utilized very skillfully Stn lin's weaknesses; feeding him with suspicions, he assisted Stalin in everything and acted with his support.
All those who interested themselves even a little in the national situation saw the difficult situation in agriculture, but Stalin never even noted it. Did we tell Stalin about this? Yes, we told him, but he did not support us. Why? Because Stalin never traveled anywhere, did not meet city and kolkhoz workers; he did not know the actual situation in he provinces. He knew the country and agriculture only from films. And these films had dressed up and beautified the existing situation in agriculture
Many films so pictured kolkhoz life that the tables were bending from the weight of turkeys and geese. Evidently Stalin thought that it was actually so.
Stalin separated himself from the people and never went anywhere. This lasted tens of years. The last time he visited a village was in January 1928 when he visited Siberia in connection with grain deliveries. How then could he have known the situation in the provinces?
And when he was once told during a discussion that our situation on the land was a difficult one and that the situation of cattle breeding and meat production was especially bad, a commission was formed which was charged with the preparation of a resolution called, "Measures toward further development of animal breeding in kolkhozes (collective farms) and sovkhozes (state farms)." We worked out this project.
Of course, our propositions of that time did not contain all possibilities, but we did charter ways in which animal breeding on the kolkhozes and sovkhozes would be raised. We had proposed then to raise the prices of such products in order to create material incentives for the kolkhoz, MTS (machine tractor stations) and sovkhoz workers in the development of cattle breeding. But our project was not accepted and in February 1953 was laid aside entirely.
What is more, while reviewing this project Stalin proposed that taxes paid by the kolkhozes and by the kolkhoz workers should raised by 40 billion rubles; according to him the peasants are well off and the kolkhoz worker would need to sell only one more chicken to pay his tax in full.
Imagine what this meant. Certainly 40 billion rubles is a sum which the kolkhoz workers did not realize for all the products which they sold to the government. In 1952 for instance, the kolkhozes and the kolkhoz workers received 26,280 million rubles for all their product delivered and sold to the government. Did Stalin's position then rest on data of any sort whatever? Of course not.
In such cases facts and figures did not interest him. If Stalin said anything, it meant it was so -after all, he was a "genius" and a genius does not need to count, he only needs to look and can immediately tell how it should be. When he expresses his opinion, everyone has to repeat it and to admire his wisdom.
We must state that after the war the situation became even mor complicated. Stalin became even more capricious, irritable and brutal, in particular his suspicion grew. His persecution mania reached unbelievable dimensions. Many workers were becoming enemies before his very eyes. After the war Stalin separated himself from the collective even more. Everything was decided by him alone without any consideration eration for anyone or anything. Let us also recall the "Affair of the Doctor-Plotters." He issued orders to arrest a group of eminent Soviet medical specialists. He personally issued advice on the conduct of the investigation and the method of interrogation of the arrested persons. He said that the academician Vinogradov should be put in chains, another one should be beaten. Present at this Congress as a delegate is the former Minister of State Security, Comrade Ignatiev. Stalin told him curtly, "If you do not obtain confessions from the doctors we will shorten you by a head."
(Tumult in the hall.)
Stalin personally called the investigative judge, gave him instructions, advised him on which investigative methods should be used; these methods were simple-beat, beat and, once again, beat.
Shortly after the doctors were arrested we members of the Political Bureau received protocols with the doctors' confessions of guilt. After distributing these protocols Stalin told us, "You are blind like young kittens; what will happen without me? The country will perish because you do not know how to recognize enemies."
We are absolutely certain that our Party, armed with the historic resolutions of the XXth Congress, will lead the Soviet people along the Leninist path to new successes, to new victories.
(Tumultuous, prolonged applause.)
Long live the victorious banner of our Party - Leninism
(Tumultuous, prolonged applause ending in ovation. All rise.)
HOME PAGE OF Thayer Watkins